Monkey business – It’s not what you know, but who you know!

Social networks shape monkey “culture”

A new study, published in Current Biology, shows that squirrel monkeys who are at the heart of their social group pick up innovations first, and are more likely to acquire new cultural variations in behaviour like novel foraging techniques.

Dr Nicolas Claidière, Ms Emily Messer and Professor Andrew Whiten of the University of St Andrews in collaboration with Dr Will Hoppitt of Anglia Ruskin University studied both our East and West squirrel monkeys. They examined their social networks by recording who spent time with whom when the monkeys were in the vicinity of an “artificial fruit” that could be used to obtain food rewards by using two different techniques, lift or pivot (Figure 1).

lift and pivot photo

Sophisticated statistical analysis of this information revealed the details of the monkeys’ social networks which helped the researchers visualize which monkeys were at the heart of the network and which were more peripheral (Figure 2). Each monkey was rated on a measure of their ‘centrality’ within the group. social network red vs blue

Boa the alpha male in the East group was briefly separated and trained how to use the lift technique and his equivalent, Rio in the West group was trained to use the pivot technique, they were then reunited with their respective groups.

The scientists found that monkeys who were well-connected were the most likely to successfully pick up the new technique seeded in their group. They were also more likely to acquire the lift technique in the group seeded with ‘lift’, versus the pivot technique in the group seeded with ‘pivot’, so the alpha males were truly the hubs of these two different monkey ‘cultures’.

Professor Whiten, from the University of St Andrews, said: “Our study shows that innovations do not just spread randomly in primate groups, but as in humans, are shaped by the monkeys’ social networks”.

Dr Claidiere said: “Research interest in social learning and social network analysis has surged in recent years, and our results are likely to stimulate further research on the spread of innovations in animal social networks.

“We suspect that our focus on a social network relevant to the diffusion of foraging innovations can explain why we found an effect of the network centrality of individuals on their learning.

“Previous research has focused on other relationships, like who grooms whom, which may not correlate with the monkeys’ observational learning in the same way”.

Emily Messer, noted another aspect of the study. “We also found that maternal relationships explained parts of the social network, so some of the diffusion of the new foraging habits were also probably reflecting an emphasis on learning within families,” she said.

Click here to lead you to the abstract of the article in Current Biology

 

 

 

 

Living Links to Life Long Learning – U3A Study Day

On the 5th of June, University of the Third Age (U3A) members from across Scotland came to their third annual study day here in Edinburgh Zoo. The theme for this year was Primatology.

With so many amazing projects happening at Budongo Trail and Living Links we felt this was an ideal opportunity for our researchers to engage with life-long learners.

The conference was set in the Budongo Trail Lecture Theatre and included a keynote speech from Professor Andy Whiten, presentations from our current PhD students, and Dr Katie Slocombe gave the delegates a live demonstration of how we study chimpanzee communication.

chimp com bannerOur guests also had a chance to explore the two enclosures with many of our staff, eoin discusses researchvolunteers and researchers on hand to answer questions.

Click here to see the full programme of the day’s events.

 

Linking to the Curriculum

On Friday April 26th we had 23 science teachers from over 15 different Scottish Secondary schools come to the zoo to take part in a teacher training day.

The day’s events included training with two of our resource packs, Measuring Behaviour and Chimpanzee and Human Chromosomes. In the chromosome activity the teachers had a chance to compare the differences and similarities in the chromosomes of humans and chimpanzees, these resources are ideal for teaching students about genetic deletions, mutations and inversions.

c and h activity

 

 

 

 

 

In the Measuring Behaviour workshop they received an overview of how to study primate behaviour then went out into the zoo to study our primates themselves.

mb activity

 

 

 

 

We got some fantastic feedback from the day and the teachers are very excited to start using our resources in their classrooms. In the future we hope to offer another training day for our other two resource packs; Working with Scientific Literature and Primate Communication.

I’ll have what she’s having – Vervet Monkey Conformity Study

vervet-monkeys6 copy

 

 

 

 

 

 

University of St Andrews researchers Dr Erica van de Waal and Professor Andrew Whiten and Christèle Borgeaud of the University of Neuchâtel have just published in the journal Science about the ability of vervet monkeys to conform to local feeding traditions.

In Living Links and Budongo Trail here in Edinburgh Zoo we do multiple studies on culture and how our primates can learn from each other, however doing this in the wild can be far more challenging, a challenge that Erica, Andy and Christèle overcame with a beautifully precise and effective experiment.

Like many species, vervet monkey infants learn a lot about life from watching their mothers, especially in instances of food choice. In this study four groups of vervet monkeys (total of 109 monkeys) in the Mawana private game reserve in South Africa were introduced to two different colours of corn.

Two groups were trained to eat pink corn and two groups were trained to eat the blue. This training phase was accomplished by making the ‘unpreferred’ food colour choice taste bitter by using aloe extracts from local plants. Approximately 4-6 months after the initial training, the corn was reintroduced to the groups with neither of the coloured corn being treated, thus making both palatable options.

Interesting the monkeys remembered which was their preferred colour choice and infants that had not seen coloured corn before only ate the same colour corn as their mothers did. In fact some of the infants sat the box of the unpreferred coloured corn to eat the ‘right’ colour, says Andy Whiten.

Not only do infant vervet monkeys adopt the ‘right’ colour corn from watching their mothers, males that emigrate to new groups will conform to eat the same colour corn as their new community. For example Groot was part of a group that was trained to eat the blue corn, as all male vervets that reach sexual maturity do he left his group to find another to be part of. When he arrived he saw that they were eating the pink corn, after a brief amount of time watching them he then joined in to eat the pink corn too.

By changing his preconceived ideas on what is appropriate to eat Groot could benefit from the new groups’ local knowledge. Professor Whiten said “It may make sense in nature, where the knowledge of the locals is often the best guide to what are the optimal behaviours in their environment”, thus the “when-in-Rome” mentality makes sense.

There was one exception in the study, a male named Lekker emigrated and immediately became the dominant male of new troop and he did not adopt their feeding preferences. This then created more questions. Did he not take on their traditions because he was dominant and felt no need to adopt the social conformity, or was he just stubbornly set in his ways? Will his new group then conform to what he eats? Since this only happened in one case, more research is required to gain further insight into social status and conformity in vervet monkeys.

Reference

van de Waal, E., Borgeaud, C., and Whiten, A. (2013). Potent Social Learning and Conformity Shape a Wild Primate’s Foraging Decisions. Science 340, 483-485.

 

Royal Society of Edinburgh (RSE) honours Prof Andy Whiten

andy medal newsProfessor Andy Whiten the Director of Living Links has been awarded the Sir James Black Prize and Medal.

He has been bestowed this honour due to his outstanding work in primatology and his innovations within the field of social learning and the cultural transmission of behaviour.

Later on this year he will be giving a guest lecture for RSE entitled “Social Learning and the Cultural Transmission of Behaviour in Human and Non-human Animals: A ‘Second Inheritance System’ in Biology.”

As soon as we know the date and location for this lecture we will post it up here on the Living Links website.

Dung Days at the Zoo

dung day blog picture

 

 

 

As part of the Edinburgh International Science Festival we are running Dung Days at the zoo. There are many activities for our visitors to take part in to learn all about poo!

A few of the research projects here in Living Links have involved using coloured glitter to help us determine which monkey left which poo. This has been helpful in studies looking at hormone levels and in our research into colour vision.

During Dung Days our visitors can create their own capuchin glitters poos!

 

 

Chimp Challenge – Memory Test

chimp challenge

 

 

 

There is a new interactive in the Living Links Centre. Our guests can play a game to find out if they have a better memory than a chimpanzee. Tetsuro Matsuzawa from Kyoto University Primate Research Institute has demonstrated that chimpanzees have an extremely good working memory and are capable of completing a number organising task at greater speeds and accuracy than humans.

Justin Quillinan and Sean Roberts two PhD students from the University of Edinburgh want to find out if with practice can humans become just as good as chimpanzees at this activity?

You can play this it at home!

http://www.kidsciencechallenge.com/year-four/as_game.php

Warning this game is highly addictive

To find out more about Justin and Sean’s research you can follow their blog.

 

Reconstructing the Evolution of Cognition – Free Lecture

dr josep call

 

 

 

 

St Andrew’s University is delighted to announce that Dr Josep Call will be presenting the Irvine Memorial Medal Lecture on Friday the 8th of March 2013 at 5:15pm in School III, St Salvador’s Quad, St Andrews University.

All are welcome to attend this free lecture.

Dr Josep Call the Director of the Wolfgang Kohler Primate Research Centre, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig will be presenting on what makes us human and how has our cognition evolved. To explore these concepts Dr Call compares the behaviour and cognition of multiple species taking into account their evolutionary relationships and ecologies in order to enlighten us on how and why humans have evolved the way we have.

Does a Capuchin’s Openness to Participate Bias our Science?

When studying animals in the wild or in captivity it is very easy to unintentionally create selection biases even when we are aware of them and try to collect data in a random fashion. One particular factor that may cause a bias is the personality of our animals.

Personality is defined as – consistent differences in an individual’s behaviour and decision making over time. Thus if we are studying animal cognition the animal’s personality will have an impact on how we get and interpret the results of our studies.

Selection biases may occur for variety of different reasons

  1. Self-selection of study subjects – The animal chooses to take part.
  2. Targeting a specific area/population
  3. Ending a study once you get the desired result
  4. Excluding data on arbitrary grounds.

A recent study by Blake Morton, Prof Phyllis Lee and Prof Hannah Buchanan-Smith of Stirling University tested to see if the capuchins at Living Links had any specific personality traits and if so did that affect how much they participated in research and also how well they performed.

The research indicated that our capuchins do have at least 5 different personality dimensions, shown in the table below.

morton et al table

The researchers then examined if these personalities affected their participation and performance in our studies so they created two tasks for the monkeys.

Task 1 The monkeys had to choose which cubicle to enter. If they chose the one with the reward in front of it they received the reward. If they chose the one without a reward they did not receive anything.

task 1 pic 1

Task 2 – The monkeys had to choose which cubicle to enter. If they chose the one with the larger cup in front of it they received the reward. If they chose the one with the smaller cup they did not receive anything.

task 2 pic 1

 

In both tasks the monkeys that scored higher on ‘openness’ and lower on ‘assertiveness’ performed better at the tasks and were also more likely to participate in the trials.

This is a very interesting result so we decided to ask Blake a few questions about the study.

Science Communication Officer (SCO) – Is there any way to avoid a personality selection bias in cognitive studies?

Blake – One possibility would be to classify subjects according to their personalities, then test for differences in task performance within those groupings. However, most studies of animal cognition do not have access to large study populations, and must therefore rely on using small sample sizes. At this point in time, we encourage researchers to consistently report the existence (or lack thereof) of a personality bias in subjects selected for testing.

SCO – Why do ‘open’ individuals perform better than ‘assertive’ individuals?

Blake – Open individuals are typically more curious and willing to engage in tasks. As a consequence, they often perform better than less Open individuals. As for Assertiveness, one intriguing possibility, which we discuss in our paper, is that more aggressive individuals (called ‘Assertive’ in our study) have a tendency to emphasize speed over accuracy when making decisions. Thus, as a consequence of such hasty decision-making, aggressive individuals may be more likely to score incorrectly on trials. To formerly test this latter possibility, however, further research on the Living Links capuchins will be necessary.

SCO – Are there any cognitive studies that would benefit from having a bias towards ‘open’ individuals?

Blake – Based on our study and others, individuals that score higher on Open traits (e.g. curious, active) typically are more willing to engage in experimental research. As a consequence, they generally learn faster and perform better on tasks compared to less Open individuals. Thus, from a logistical point of view, yes, a study might benefit from having a bias towards more Open individuals because it potentially means that less training/testing is needed. However, as we discuss in the paper, caution should be used when comparing data to other studies.

 

 

SciLogs Blog about Living Links Science Engagement

SEZ at Living Links

In early 2012 Dr Mark Bowler, Prof Hannah Buchanan-Smith and Prof Andy Whiten published a great article on the assessment of the science engagement that goes on in the Living Links Centre. This article has been well received by many zoo educators and scientists alike.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0034505

The article was recently recommended to Matt Shipman who writes for SciLogs – The daily storyline of science. He posted a review on their blog commenting on the benefits of zoos in educating people about science outside of the classroom and lecture theatres.

Click on the link below to read his review!

http://www.scilogs.com/communication_breakdown/zoo-outreach-paper/